RESTRICTED LEXIS: MAIN THEORETICAL APPROACHES IN ITS STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i3.pp46-50Keywords:
Restricted lexis, Limited lexical items, Terminology, Stylistics, Semiotics, Translation theory, Sociolinguistics, Cognitive approach, Digital era, Internet jargon.Abstract
In this article, the concept of restricted lexis in a language is examined from various theoretical perspectives, drawing upon scholarly works published in Sweden, England, Russia, France, Turkey, and Germany. The author emphasizes that restricted lexis differs from the general lexical stock by virtue of occurring in particular spheres (professional jargon, specialized fields, subcultural or colloquial speech). The main theoretical approaches—terminological (focus on domain-specific terms), stylistic (emphasis on functional styles), semiotic (symbols and coded signs), translational (functional adaptation in other languages), sociolinguistic (group-based lexicon), and cognitive (mental categorization)—are reviewed in detail. The paper also addresses the expansion of restricted lexis in the digital era (e.g., slang on social media, internet jargon), the importance of corpus linguistics, interviews, and contextual analysis for research methodology, and highlights the practical significance of studying restricted lexis for translation, lexicography, marketing, and other domains. Ultimately, the author concludes that restricted lexis proves to be a critical object of inquiry for modern linguistics, stylistics, translation studies, and sociolinguistics, particularly as globalization and digital communications continue to generate new subvarieties of vocabulary.References
Johansson, C. (2018). Kommunikation i organisationer. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page.
Kieser, A. (2010). Organisationstheorien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Gerchikova, I.N. (2000). Менеджмент. Москва: Юнити-Дана.
Mucchielli, A. (2013). Les processus sociaux. Paris: Armand Colin.
Öztürk, H. (2021). Eğitim Yönetimi ve Denetimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Журавлёв, В. (2012). Региональная экономика и информационные технологии. Москва: Юнити-Дана.
De Bono, E. (1985). Six Thinking Hats. London: Penguin.
Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.



