COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TOLERANT ATTITUDES TOWARDS HEROES IN UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LITERATURE

Authors

  • Zhuraeva Mashkhura Kodirovna Associate Professor of the Department of Uzbek Language and Literature, NamSTU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i5.pp21-25

Keywords:

Gender tolerance, Uzbek literature, Russian literature, literary analysis, social stereotypes, gender roles.

Abstract

This article examines the role of gender tolerance in Uzbek and Russian literature through the analysis of characters in the works of Chulpon, Qadiriya, Dostoevsky and Pushkin. The main attention is paid to how literary images affect the formation of public ideas about gender roles. The article emphasizes the importance of literature in the discussion and rethinking of gender stereotypes and suggests ways to use literary analysis for the development of gender Tolerance.

References

Chulpon A. Kecha va kunduz : novel / A. Chulpon ; [ed. N. Karimov]. — Toshkent : Sharқ, 2000. — 272 p. (in Russian).

Қодирий А. Меҳробдан чаён : роман / А. Қодирий. — Тошкент : Ғафур Ғулом номидаги адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти, 1994. — 334 с.

Dostoevsky F. M. Prestuplenie i nakazanie [Crime and punishment: a novel]. — St. Petersburg : Azbuka, 2020. 640 p.

Pushkin A. S. Evgeniy Onegin: a novel in verse / A. S. Pushkin. — Moscow : Prospekt, 2021. - 320 p.

Barteneva T. S. Gender roles in 19th century Russian literature / T. S. Barteneva // Slavic Review. – 2018. – Vol. 77, No 3. – P. 412–430.

Jalolova Z. B. Changing female images in Uzbek literature of the 20th century / Z. B. Jalolova // Central Asian Journal of Literature. – 2019. – Vol. 5, No 2. – P. 132–145.

Abdurakhmanov M. Contemporary approaches to gender equality in Uzbekistan: historical overview and policy implications / M. Abdurakhmanov // Sociology of Central Asia. – 2020. – Vol. 11, No 1. – P. 54–67.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TOLERANT ATTITUDES TOWARDS HEROES IN UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LITERATURE. (2025). Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i5.pp21-25