COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC MODELS OF LITERARY MEANING FORMATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK NOVELS

Authors

  • Kurbanova Ilmira Sharifovna Associate Professor, Tashkent State Transport University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2026.v4.i10.pp21-26

Keywords:

Cognitive semantics, frame, conceptual blending, text world, image schema, literary meaning, English novel, Uzbek novel.

Abstract

The article asks which cognitive model a reader must construct to interpret a passage of literary prose, and whether English and Uzbek texts call for these models through different linguistic means. Four models are examined – frame transfer, conceptual blending, text-world switching and image schemas – on eight passages from G. Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, K. Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go, V. Woolf's To the Lighthouse, A. Qodiriy's O'tkan kunlar, A. Cho'lpon's Kecha va kunduz and O'. Hoshimov's Tushda kechgan umrlar. Each passage is analysed for its input structures, type of projection, linguistic trigger and emergent meaning. The analysis shows that comparable models are triggered in English mainly by syntactic and lexical means (definitional copula, polysemy, second-person conditional, adjectives of size) and in Uzbek mainly by register-marked loanwords, numerals with modal particles, inclusive and counterfactual morphology and lexicalised spatial idioms. The same model may also project in opposite directions: Orwell raises a trivial frame to an absolute, while Hoshimov lowers atrocity to routine.

References

1. Fillmore C. J. Frame Semantics // Linguistics in the Morning Calm / ed. by the Linguistic Society of Korea. – Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, 1982. – P. 111–137.

2. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. – New York: Basic Books, 2002. – xvii, 440 p.

3. Werth P. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. – Harlow: Longman, 1999. – (Textual Explorations).

4. Gavins J. Text World Theory: An Introduction. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007. – x, 193 p.

5. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. – xxxviii, 233 p.

6. Semino E. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. – London; New York: Longman, 1997. – (Textual Explorations).

7. Кубрякова Е. С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке: Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль языка в познании мира. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. – 560 с.

8. Болдырев Н. Н. Концептуальное пространство когнитивной лингвистики // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. – 2004. – № 1. – С. 18–36.

9. Safarov Sh. Kognitiv tilshunoslik. – Jizzax: Sangzor, 2006.

10. Xudoyberganova D. Matnning antropotsentrik tadqiqi. – Toshkent: Fan, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC MODELS OF LITERARY MEANING FORMATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK NOVELS. (2026). Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(10), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2026.v4.i10.pp21-26