METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING CREATIVE COMPETENCE IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION BASED ON INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT RESEARCH

Authors

  • Usmanov Bakhtiyor Khabibullayevich Academic Lyceum No. 2 of the Tashkent State Medical University (AL №. 2 TSMU), Chemistry Teacher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2026.v4.i3.pp39-45

Keywords:

Chemistry education, creative competence, international assessment research, competency-based approach, innovative methodology.

Abstract

The development of creative competence is a priority in modern chemistry education, reflecting global shifts toward competency-based learning. International assessment research emphasizes creativity, problem-solving, and the application of scientific knowledge in real-life contexts. This study aims to develop and validate a methodology for fostering students’ creative competence in chemistry education through international assessment-oriented instructional strategies. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving control and experimental groups. The findings indicate a statistically significant improvement in students’ creative competence in the experimental group, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed methodology and its alignment with international educational standards.

References

1.OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

2.OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 creative thinking framework. OECD Publishing.

3.OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.

4.Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.

5.Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Longman.

6.Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

7.Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service.

8.Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Academic Press.

9.Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.

10.Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

11.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

12.Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

13.Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

14.Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.

15.Kind, P., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges. Studies in Science Education, 43(1), 1–37.

16.Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

17.Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Teaching creativity in science education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 1–14.

18.Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223.

19.Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.

20.De Jong, O., & Taber, K. S. (2014). Teaching and learning the many faces of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(3), 1–12.

21.Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). Technology-enabled active learning in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.

22.Trnova, E., & Trna, J. (2014). Implementation of creativity in science teacher training. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 54–66.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING CREATIVE COMPETENCE IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION BASED ON INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT RESEARCH. (2026). Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2026.v4.i3.pp39-45