ANCESTORCENTRISM AND THE GBEWAAH DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM; A TRANS-LEVEL PARAXIS

Authors

  • Dr. Abu Tia Jambedu Institution: Millar Institute for Transdisciplinary and Development Studies (MITDS/MOU) P. O BOX 607, Bolgatanga Upper East Region Ghana Department: Culture and Development Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i12.pp40-63

Keywords:

Ancestorcentrism; Trans-Development; Gbewaa Development Paradigm; Indigenous Knowledge Systems; Gross Societal Wellbeing; System Transdisciplinarity.

Abstract

This paper advances Trans-Development as a novel ontological and cosmological framework emerging from Ancestorcentrism and operationalised through the Gbewaa Development Paradigm. In response to the limitations of GDP-centred, technocratic, and sectoral development models, the study introduces the Trans-Level as a meta-integrative space where development is governed by communal ethics (axiology), validated through lived experience and ancestral authority (gnosiology), and enacted through relational governance. Drawing on African Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the lived cosmologies of the Mole–Dagbamba peoples of Ghana, Togo, and Burkina Faso, the paper repositions ancestral wisdom as a living epistemic and moral foundation for science, leadership, and development.
The core finding reveals that Trans-Level development moves beyond science, data, and quantitative indicators by capturing lived realities—peace, social harmony, ecological balance, and intergenerational continuity—that conventional development indices cannot adequately measure. Development is thus redefined as a cyclical process that transforms wealth (total potential) into worth (realised communal wellbeing), culminating in Gross Societal Wellbeing (GSW) rather than economic growth alone.
The study concludes that sustainable development cannot be meaningfully achieved through indicators alone. It recommends that development policy and practice adopt holistic wellbeing frameworks, including context-specific Gross National Wellbeing (GNW) metrics grounded in Indigenous cosmologies and communal values, to assess whether development interventions genuinely translate into happiness, peace, and national harmony at community and national levels.

References

1.Chilisa, B. (2020). Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). Sage.

2.Chilisa, B., Major, T., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2023). Indigenous relational ethics and transdisciplinary knowledge. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management.

3.Costanza, R., et al. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing. Ecological Economics, 93, 57–68.

4.Fioramonti, L., Coscieme, L., & Mortensen, L. (2022). Beyond GDP. Agenda Publishing.

5.Jambedu, T. A., Badigamsira, I. A., and Millar, D. (2024). Ancestorcentrism: A Philosophical Paradigm for Transdisciplinary Research ( A ). Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (ZJSSH), 30(March), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.62480

6.Kelman, I. (2024). Disasters, climate change, and wicked problems: Rethinking complexity, governance, and solutions. Routledge.

7.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003352261

8.Lynch, J. M., Dowrick, C., Meredith, P., McGregor, S. L. T., & van Driel, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27(3), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13446

9.Manuel-Navarrete, D. (2025). Inclusive transdisciplinarity: Embracing multiple cosmologies and “multi-science” approaches for sustainability governance. Futures. Advance online publication.

10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103250

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ANCESTORCENTRISM AND THE GBEWAAH DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM; A TRANS-LEVEL PARAXIS. (2025). Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(12), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i12.pp40-63