ANCESTORCENTRISM AND THE GBEWAAH DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM; A TRANS-LEVEL PARAXIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i12.pp40-63Keywords:
Ancestorcentrism; Trans-Development; Gbewaa Development Paradigm; Indigenous Knowledge Systems; Gross Societal Wellbeing; System Transdisciplinarity.Abstract
This paper advances Trans-Development as a novel ontological and cosmological framework emerging from Ancestorcentrism and operationalised through the Gbewaa Development Paradigm. In response to the limitations of GDP-centred, technocratic, and sectoral development models, the study introduces the Trans-Level as a meta-integrative space where development is governed by communal ethics (axiology), validated through lived experience and ancestral authority (gnosiology), and enacted through relational governance. Drawing on African Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the lived cosmologies of the Mole–Dagbamba peoples of Ghana, Togo, and Burkina Faso, the paper repositions ancestral wisdom as a living epistemic and moral foundation for science, leadership, and development.
The core finding reveals that Trans-Level development moves beyond science, data, and quantitative indicators by capturing lived realities—peace, social harmony, ecological balance, and intergenerational continuity—that conventional development indices cannot adequately measure. Development is thus redefined as a cyclical process that transforms wealth (total potential) into worth (realised communal wellbeing), culminating in Gross Societal Wellbeing (GSW) rather than economic growth alone.
The study concludes that sustainable development cannot be meaningfully achieved through indicators alone. It recommends that development policy and practice adopt holistic wellbeing frameworks, including context-specific Gross National Wellbeing (GNW) metrics grounded in Indigenous cosmologies and communal values, to assess whether development interventions genuinely translate into happiness, peace, and national harmony at community and national levels.
References
1.Chilisa, B. (2020). Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). Sage.
2.Chilisa, B., Major, T., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2023). Indigenous relational ethics and transdisciplinary knowledge. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management.
3.Costanza, R., et al. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing. Ecological Economics, 93, 57–68.
4.Fioramonti, L., Coscieme, L., & Mortensen, L. (2022). Beyond GDP. Agenda Publishing.
5.Jambedu, T. A., Badigamsira, I. A., and Millar, D. (2024). Ancestorcentrism: A Philosophical Paradigm for Transdisciplinary Research ( A ). Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (ZJSSH), 30(March), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.62480
6.Kelman, I. (2024). Disasters, climate change, and wicked problems: Rethinking complexity, governance, and solutions. Routledge.
7.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003352261
8.Lynch, J. M., Dowrick, C., Meredith, P., McGregor, S. L. T., & van Driel, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27(3), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13446
9.Manuel-Navarrete, D. (2025). Inclusive transdisciplinarity: Embracing multiple cosmologies and “multi-science” approaches for sustainability governance. Futures. Advance online publication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.



