THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COMPETENCY INTERFERENCE IN COGNITIVE-NEURODIDACTIC-COMPETENCY-INTEGRATIVE EDUCATIONAL MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i10.pp80-89Keywords:
Competency interference, CNCI model, cognitive load theory, engineering education, cognitive phases, competency-based learning.Abstract
The integration of cognitive, neuropsychological, and competency-based approaches in the Cognitive-Neurodidactic-Competency-Integrative (CNCI) educational model presents significant challenges when phases and competencies are not properly aligned. This study analyzes competency interference phenomena that occur when universal human competencies (UHC), personal competencies (PC), general professional competencies (GPC), and professional competencies (PRC) are organized in a discordant manner. Through analysis of cognitive load theory (CLT), dual coding theory (DCT), and brain-based learning (BBL) frameworks, we identify four primary types of interference: functional, methodological, sequential, and load interference. Our findings demonstrate that cognitive phase misalignment, unmanaged cognitive loads, and contextual detachment significantly impair learning outcomes in engineering education. We propose systematic solutions including phase-based competency alignment, balanced cognitive load distribution, and interdisciplinary integration strategies. This research provides theoretical foundations and practical frameworks for optimizing competency-based curricula in technical education.
References
1.Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
2.Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press.
3.Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4.Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
5.Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.
6.Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
7.Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
8.Cooper, H. M. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
9.Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., ... & Harris, K. A. (2010). Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 638-645.
10.Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
